Usage Score
12.6
Player Dossier
2013-2017Ohio
TE • 6'6" • 256 lbs • Union, OH, USA
Troy Mangen reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.6
Efficiency
73.8
Consistency
73.9
Season Value
62.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Troy Mangen, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Ohio. Troy Mangen reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Ohio paired 139 primary output with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
27.8
Efficiency
73.8
Usage
12.6
Consistency
73.9
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 24. Kansas: 35. Eastern Michigan: 5. Central Michigan: 26. Miami (OH): 49
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 1 by 100. Kansas: 3 by 77.8. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 33.3. Central Michigan: 3 by 57.8. Miami (OH): 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Ohio | 12 | 21.1 | 6.6 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 12 | 21.1 | 6.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 147 | 48.9 | 12.5 | 135 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | -147 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio | 142 | 53.4 | 10.5 | 142 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio | 139 | 73.8 | 12.6 | -3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio | 139 | 73.8 | 12.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49
Primary metric
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
40
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 68.3 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 68.3 efficiency score.
#5
Kansas
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Ohio
139 primary output · 73.8 efficiency · 12.6 usage
62.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Ohio
62.2
139 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 12.6 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Ohio
51.6
147 primary · 48.9 efficiency · 12.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7483
Northmont · Clayton, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
440
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Troy Mangen quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit