Player Dossier

2013-2017

UTEP

Zack Greenlee

QB • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Stockton, CA, USA

Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator

Zack Greenlee is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.4 usage in the latest tracked season.

Usage Score

16.4

Efficiency

54

Consistency

69.8

Season Value

59.9

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTEP

131414151617

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Fresno State • UTEP
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Army

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Zack Greenlee, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTEP. Zack Greenlee is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.4 usage in the latest tracked season.

Zack Greenlee played QB for Fresno State and UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Zack Greenlee recorded 2,592 passing yards, 127 rushing yards, and 25 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with UTEP.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

UTEP paired 932 primary output with 54 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 54 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Fresno State, UTEP.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky

Loss with 170 yards of offense and 64.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · UTEP

Games

9

Primary Metric / G

103.6

Efficiency

54

Usage

16.4

Consistency

69.8

Best Game by takeover score

UAB

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 31. Arizona: 100. Army: 71. Western Kentucky: 170. Southern Miss: 75. UTSA: 147. North Texas: 148. Louisiana Tech: 64. UAB: 126

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 8 by 64.9. Arizona: 18 by 48. Army: 17 by 52.6. Western Kentucky: 30 by 64.8. Southern Miss: 13 by 60.6. UTSA: 32 by 46.2. North Texas: 32 by 57. Louisiana Tech: 14 by 49.5. UAB: 27 by 42.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Losses103.6 · Games = 9
First Half89.4 · Games = 5 · -31.8 vs Second Half
Second Half121.3 · Games = 4 · +31.8 vs First Half
All Games103.6 · Games = 9

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

9 games

Featured metric

Total Offense

Top game by takeover score

Western Kentucky

Best efficiency game

64.9 vs Oklahoma

Result
Sat 11/25@ UABL 7-2881810744.41242.79192.10017
Sat 11/18vs Louisiana TechL 21-42395933.30049.555109
Sat 11/11@ North TexasL 10-45132510952.001577395.60015
Sun 10/29vs UTSAL 14-3182913327.60246.23144.7016
Sat 10/14@ Southern MissL 0-245106350.00060.6312408
Sun 10/8vs Western KentuckyL 14-15122212454.51064.88465.80111
Sat 9/30@ ArmyL 21-357138853.81052.64-17-4.3003
Sat 9/16vs ArizonaL 16-63111710464.711481-4-400
Sat 9/2@ OklahomaL 7-56583162.50064.9

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Fresno State

    2013-2015

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    UTEP

    2016-2017

    Final stop

Season Progression

201320142014201520162017
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2013 Regular SeasonFresno State0
2014 PostseasonFresno State25855.511.3258
2014 Regular SeasonFresno State25855.511.30
2015 Regular SeasonFresno State86754.612.9609
2016 Regular SeasonUTEP66255.65.3-205
2017 Regular SeasonUTEP9325416.4270

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Army

Loss with 144 yards of offense and 74.5 efficiency.

144

Primary metric

144 total offense with 74.5 efficiency.

#2

Utah

144

Primary metric

Loss with 144 yards of offense and 86.7 efficiency.

144 total offense with 86.7 efficiency.

#3

Louisiana Tech

69

Primary metric

Loss with 69 yards of offense and 93.3 efficiency.

69 total offense with 93.3 efficiency.

#4

Western Kentucky

170

Primary metric

Loss with 170 yards of offense and 64.8 efficiency.

170 total offense with 64.8 efficiency.

#5

Hawai'i

305

Primary metric

Win with 305 yards of offense and 61.3 efficiency.

305 total offense with 61.3 efficiency.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2017 Regular Season · UTEP

932 primary output · 54 efficiency · 16.4 usage

59.9

#2

2015 Regular Season · Fresno State

54.4

867 primary · 54.6 efficiency · 12.9 usage

#3

2016 Regular Season · UTEP

47.7

662 primary · 55.6 efficiency · 5.3 usage

Milestones

1

250+ passing yards

1

300+ total offense

1

3+ takeover TD games

9

Above avg efficiency

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2013 · Rating 0.8801

Lincoln · Stockton, CA

Committed To
Fresno State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2013

Career Facts

2

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

2,719

Career Total Offense

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.