Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Fresno State paired 16 primary output with 54.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Jeff Camilli College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 107
- TFL
- 9
- Sacks
- 4
- QB hurries
- 1
- Passes defended
- 2
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Fresno State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Fresno State | 1 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 50 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Fresno State | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 44.2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Fresno State | 11 | 107 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 73.1 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 54.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Fresno State
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
54.3
Usage
15.2
Consistency
38.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 0. Toledo: 2. Tulsa: 5. UNLV: 1. Nevada: 0. San Diego State: 0.5. Utah State: 0. Air Force: 2. Colorado State: 1.5. Hawai'i: 1. San José State: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 10 by 41.7. Toledo: 7 by 49.2. Tulsa: 14 by 100. UNLV: 10 by 51.7. Nevada: 10 by 41.7. San Diego State: 10 by 46.7. Utah State: 8 by 33.3. Air Force: 11 by 65.8. Colorado State: 8 by 48.3. Hawai'i: 7 by 39.2. San José State: 12 by 80
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
First Half1.4 · Games = 6 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.5 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs First Half
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jeff Camilli
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.