Player Stats

Sefo Liufau College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
10,704
Passing yards
9,765
Rushing yards
939
Touchdowns
74

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonColorado81,8221,779431254.6
2014 Regular SeasonColorado123,3363,2001362968.9
2015 Regular SeasonColorado112,6862,4202661469.1
2016 PostseasonColorado12193195-2172.2
2016 Regular SeasonColorado122,6672,1714961872.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Colorado paired 2,860 primary output with 59.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 59.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Washington State

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Colorado

Games

12

Primary Metric / G

238.3

Efficiency

59.6

Usage

31.1

Consistency

74.5

Best Game by takeover score

Washington State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 193. Colorado State: 384. Idaho State: 258. Michigan: 250. USC: 13. Arizona State: 303. Stanford: 173. UCLA: 201. Arizona: 269. Washington State: 453. Utah: 329. Washington: 34

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 42 by 54.5. Colorado State: 47 by 74.3. Idaho State: 24 by 91.9. Michigan: 33 by 62.8. USC: 6 by 51. Arizona State: 45 by 68.1. Stanford: 42 by 53.8. UCLA: 53 by 50.4. Arizona: 44 by 63.6. Washington State: 64 by 70.7. Utah: 65 by 57.9. Washington: 19 by 16.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins296.3 · Games = 8 · +173.8 vs Losses
Losses122.5 · Games = 4 · -173.8 vs Wins