Player Stats

Nathan Strock College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
168
Passing yards
104
Rushing yards
64
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonKent State00000-
2014 Regular SeasonKent State716810464248.3
2015 Regular SeasonKent State00000-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

Kent State paired 168 primary output with 50.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 50.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Toledo

Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Kent State

Games

7

Primary Metric / G

24

Efficiency

50.7

Usage

11.6

Consistency

16.5

Best Game by takeover score

Toledo

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: -4. Virginia: 4. Northern Illinois: -5. Army: 7. Miami (OH): 5. Toledo: 138. Bowling Green: 23

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 10 by 29.5. Virginia: 6 by 46.5. Northern Illinois: 2 by 25. Army: 1 by 70. Miami (OH): 1 by 80.6. Toledo: 23 by 64.7. Bowling Green: 12 by 38.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins7 · Games = 1 · -19.8 vs Losses
Losses26.8 · Games = 6 · +19.8 vs Wins