Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Utah
DT • 6'4" • 295 lbs • Woods Cross, UT, USA
Filipo Mokofisi shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.4
Efficiency
17.6
Consistency
36.7
Season Value
20
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Utah
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Filipo Mokofisi, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Utah. Filipo Mokofisi shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.6 disruption score.
Filipo Mokofisi played DT for Utah. Across 5 tracked seasons, Filipo Mokofisi recorded 71 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Utah.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Utah paired 14 primary output with 25.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 17.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
17.6
Usage
6.4
Consistency
36.7
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 0. Unknown: 1. BYU: 4. Arizona: 0. Stanford: 0.5. USC: 0. Arizona State: 0. Oregon: 1. UCLA: 0. Washington: 1. Colorado: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. BYU: 1 by 44.2. Arizona: 5 by 20.8. Stanford: 3 by 17.5. USC: 3 by 12.5. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3. Oregon: 2 by 18.3. UCLA: 1 by 4.2. Washington: 5 by 30.8. Colorado: 2 by 18.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
44.2 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/26 | @ West Virginia | W 30-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Colorado | W 34-13 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | @ Washington | L 30-33 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs UCLA | W 48-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Oregon | L 20-41 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Arizona State | L 10-30 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | @ USC | L 27-28 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Stanford | L 20-23 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Arizona | W 30-24 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ BYUSplash game | W 19-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Utah | 14 | 25.2 | 7.8 | 14 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah | 14 | 25.2 | 7.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Utah | 8.5 | 17.6 | 6.4 | -5.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah | 8.5 | 17.6 | 6.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
BYU
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.8 takeover score.
#2
San José State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.2 takeover score.
#3
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.4 takeover score.
#4
Oregon State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 32.3 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 30 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Utah
14 primary output · 25.2 efficiency · 7.8 usage
29.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Utah
29.1
14 primary · 25.2 efficiency · 7.8 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Utah
20
8.5 primary · 17.6 efficiency · 6.4 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8042
Woods Cross · Woods Cross, UT
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
71
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.