Usage Score
3.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Purdue
RB • 5'10" • Schererville, IN, USA
David Yancey leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 67.4 efficiency.
Usage Score
3.1
Efficiency
67.4
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
58.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Yancey, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue. David Yancey leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 67.4 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Purdue paired 100 primary output with 67.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 67.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Scrimmage Yards / G
14.3
Efficiency
67.4
Usage
3.1
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 29. Nevada: 9. Maryland: 2. Illinois: 17. Penn State: 19. Northwestern: 11. Indiana: 13
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 3 by 68.4. Nevada: 1 by 87.5. Maryland: 1 by 20.8. Illinois: 2 by 70.8. Penn State: 1 by 100. Northwestern: 4 by 24. Indiana: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs Indiana
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 24 | 23.7 | 3.1 | 24 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 100 | 67.4 | 3.1 | 76 |
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Loss with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
29
Primary metric
29 scrimmage yards and 5.3 usage.
#2
Penn State
19
Primary metric
Loss with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
19 scrimmage yards and 1.6 usage.
#3
Illinois
21
Primary metric
Loss with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
21 scrimmage yards and 7.1 usage.
#4
Indiana
13
Primary metric
Loss with 13 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
13 scrimmage yards and 1.7 usage.
#5
Illinois
17
Primary metric
Win with 17 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
17 scrimmage yards and 3.1 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
100 primary output · 67.4 efficiency · 3.1 usage
58.2
#2
2014 Regular Season · Purdue
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
17.4
24 primary · 23.7 efficiency · 3.1 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8325
Mays · Atlanta, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
124
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
David Yancey quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit