Usage Score
12.3
Player Dossier
2013-2016Purdue
Jake Replogle
DT • 6'5" • Centerville, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jake Replogle shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
38.4
Consistency
50
Season Value
31.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jake Replogle, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue. Jake Replogle shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Purdue paired 12 primary output with 38.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 38.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
38.4
Usage
12.3
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Cincinnati: 1. Nevada: 1.5. Maryland: 2. Illinois: 0. Minnesota: 1. Wisconsin: 2.5. Indiana: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 8 by 33.3. Cincinnati: 6 by 35. Nevada: 4 by 31.7. Maryland: 7 by 49.2. Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Minnesota: 2 by 18.3. Wisconsin: 8 by 58.3. Indiana: 7 by 69.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=2 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses2.1 · n=5 · +1.4 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=4 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.9 · n=4 · +0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ IndianaSplash game | L 24-26 | 7 | 7 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs WisconsinSplash game | L 20-49 | 8 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Minnesota | L 31-44 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Illinois | W 34-31 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Maryland | L 7-50 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Nevada | W 24-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Cincinnati | L 20-38 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 12 | 38.4 | 12.3 | 12 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 64.1 takeover score.
#2
Wisconsin
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.9 takeover score.
#4
Nevada
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 25.7 takeover score.
#5
Cincinnati
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 25.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
12 primary output · 38.4 efficiency · 12.3 usage
31.7
#2
2013 Regular Season · Purdue
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Purdue
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.84
Centerville · Dayton, OH
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
45
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.