Usage Score
4.2
Player Dossier
2013-2017Purdue
Garrett Hudson
LB • 6'2" • 245 lbs • Tallahassee, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Garrett Hudson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
14.9
Consistency
9.1
Season Value
9.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Purdue
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Garrett Hudson, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Purdue. Garrett Hudson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.9 disruption score.
Garrett Hudson played LB for Purdue. Across 5 tracked seasons, Garrett Hudson recorded 32 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Purdue.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 14.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
14.9
Usage
4.2
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 0. Ohio: 0. Missouri: 0. Michigan: 0. Minnesota: 1.5. Wisconsin: 0. Rutgers: 0. Nebraska: 0. Illinois: 1. Northwestern: 0. Indiana: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 1 by 4.2. Ohio: 1 by 4.2. Missouri: 1 by 4.2. Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Minnesota: 6 by 40. Wisconsin: 7 by 29.2. Rutgers: 2 by 8.3. Nebraska: 5 by 20.8. Illinois: 5 by 30.8. Indiana: 1 by 14.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.7 · Games = 5 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
40 vs Minnesota
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Indiana | W 31-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Northwestern | L 13-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Illinois | W 29-10 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Nebraska | L 24-25 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Rutgers | L 12-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Wisconsin | L 9-17 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Minnesota | W 31-17 | 6 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Michigan | L 10-28 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Missouri | W 35-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Ohio | W 44-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Louisville | L 28-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 3.5 | 14.9 | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5
Primary metric
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.
#2
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35.3 takeover score.
#3
Indiana
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 29.6 takeover score.
#4
Wisconsin
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 11.1 takeover score.
#5
Nebraska
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
33.9
0 primary · 1.4 efficiency · 0.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
9.8
3.5 primary · 14.9 efficiency · 4.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8178
North Florida Christian · Tallahassee, FL
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
32
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.