Usage Score
4.3
Player Dossier
2013-2017Kansas State
Cre Moore
DB • 6'0" • 184 lbs • Broken Arrow, OK, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cre Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
16.2
Consistency
35.2
Season Value
17.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Kansas State
13141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Kansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cre Moore, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Kansas State. Cre Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Kansas State paired 5 primary output with 31.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 16.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Kansas State
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
16.2
Usage
4.3
Consistency
35.2
Best Game by takeover score
UCLA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 0. Unknown: 0. Charlotte: 1. Vanderbilt: 1. Baylor: 0.5. Texas: 0. Texas Tech: 0. West Virginia: 1. Oklahoma State: 1. Iowa State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Charlotte: 2 by 18.3. Vanderbilt: 2 by 18.3. Baylor: 1 by 9.2. Texas: 4 by 16.7. Texas Tech: 7 by 29.2. West Virginia: 3 by 22.5. Oklahoma State: 3 by 22.5. Iowa State: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.4 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 3 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
29.2 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/27 | @ UCLA | W 35-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Iowa State | W 20-19 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Oklahoma State | W 45-40 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs West Virginia | L 23-28 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Texas Tech | W 42-35 | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Texas | L 34-40 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Baylor | W 33-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Vanderbilt | L 7-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Charlotte | W 55-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas State
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Kansas State | 5 | 31.9 | 6.3 | 5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kansas State | 5 | 31.9 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Kansas State | 4.5 | 16.2 | 4.3 | -0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kansas State | 4.5 | 16.2 | 4.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
TCU
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#2
Charlotte
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.8 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.7 takeover score.
#4
West Virginia
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.7 takeover score.
#5
Vanderbilt
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Kansas State
5 primary output · 31.9 efficiency · 6.3 usage
21.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Kansas State
21.8
5 primary · 31.9 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Kansas State
17.9
4.5 primary · 16.2 efficiency · 4.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8133
Northwestern · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- UAB
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
39
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.