Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2013-2016Ole Miss
WR • 6'3" • Cedar Hill, TX, USA
Quincy Adeboyejo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.2
Efficiency
79.6
Consistency
75.6
Season Value
61.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Ole Miss
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quincy Adeboyejo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Ole Miss. Quincy Adeboyejo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 604 primary output with 80.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
38
Efficiency
79.6
Usage
12.2
Consistency
75.6
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 40. Unknown: 6. Alabama: 22. Georgia: 38. Memphis: 44. Arkansas: 61. LSU: 31. Auburn: 76. Georgia Southern: 14. Texas A&M: 37. Vanderbilt: 47. Mississippi State: 40
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 40. Alabama: 2 by 73.3. Georgia: 3 by 84.4. Memphis: 5 by 58.7. Arkansas: 4 by 100. LSU: 2 by 100. Auburn: 4 by 100. Georgia Southern: 2 by 46.7. Texas A&M: 2 by 100. Vanderbilt: 5 by 62.7. Mississippi State: 3 by 88.9
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs Mississippi State | L 20-55 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Vanderbilt | L 17-38 | — | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Texas A&M | W 29-28 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Georgia Southern | W 37-27 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Auburn | L 29-40 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ LSU | L 21-38 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Arkansas | L 30-34 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Memphis | W 48-28 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Georgia | W 45-14 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Alabama | L 43-48 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Tue 9/6 | @ Florida State | L 34-45 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 30 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ole Miss
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Ole Miss | 81 | 65.3 | 6.3 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 81 | 65.3 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Ole Miss | 313 | 75.9 | 15.7 | 232 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 313 | 75.9 | 15.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Ole Miss | 604 | 80.6 | 13 | 291 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 604 | 80.6 | 13 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 456 | 79.6 | 12.2 | -148 |
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120
Primary metric
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 81.1 efficiency score.
#3
Auburn
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas A&M
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Ole Miss
604 primary output · 80.6 efficiency · 13 usage
61.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · Ole Miss
61.2
604 primary · 80.6 efficiency · 13 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Ole Miss
61.2
456 primary · 79.6 efficiency · 12.2 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8725
Cedar Hill · Cedar Hill, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,454
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Quincy Adeboyejo quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit