Player Stats

Stacy Coley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,222
Receptions
167
Touchdowns
23

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 PostseasonMiami12332068.2
2013 Regular SeasonMiami12305591068.2
2014 PostseasonMiami12431042.8
2014 Regular SeasonMiami1219153042.8
2015 PostseasonMiami11448180.8
2015 Regular SeasonMiami1144645380.8
2016 PostseasonMiami13551080.7
2016 Regular SeasonMiami1358703980.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Miami paired 693 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 74.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Miami

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

58

Efficiency

74.2

Usage

23.3

Consistency

71

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 51. Florida A&M: 13. Florida Atlantic: 38. App State: 85. Georgia Tech: 75. Florida State: 80. North Carolina: 12. Virginia Tech: 49. Notre Dame: 81. Pittsburgh: 59. Virginia: 39. NC State: 54. Duke: 118

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 5 by 68. Florida A&M: 2 by 43.3. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 63.3. App State: 5 by 100. Georgia Tech: 4 by 100. Florida State: 7 by 76.2. North Carolina: 2 by 40. Virginia Tech: 5 by 65.3. Notre Dame: 7 by 77.1. Pittsburgh: 9 by 43.7. Virginia: 2 by 100. NC State: 2 by 100. Duke: 9 by 87.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins59.1 · Games = 9 · +3.6 vs Losses
Losses55.5 · Games = 4 · -3.6 vs Wins