Player Stats

Jordan Wilkins College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,073
Rushing yards
1,751
Receiving yards
322
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonOle Miss00000-
2014 PostseasonOle Miss13330029
2014 Regular SeasonOle Miss133643586229
2015 PostseasonOle Miss13934845145.6
2015 Regular SeasonOle Miss1336133130345.6
2016 Regular SeasonOle Miss00000-
2017 Regular SeasonOle Miss121,2521,0112411081

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

Ole Miss paired 1,252 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 66.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M

Loss with 153 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · Ole Miss

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

104.3

Efficiency

66.7

Usage

28.2

Consistency

76.8

Best Game by takeover score

Texas A&M

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 53. UT Martin: 76. California: 46. Alabama: 96. Auburn: 131. Vanderbilt: 150. LSU: 86. Arkansas: 142. Kentucky: 71. Louisiana: 138. Texas A&M: 153. Mississippi State: 110

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 11 by 42.7. UT Martin: 12 by 51.4. California: 16 by 33.6. Alabama: 13 by 80.8. Auburn: 18 by 61.6. Vanderbilt: 20 by 70.5. LSU: 13 by 68.9. Arkansas: 17 by 80.9. Kentucky: 11 by 61.3. Louisiana: 15 by 88.3. Texas A&M: 21 by 78.7. Mississippi State: 14 by 81.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins99.7 · Games = 6 · -9.3 vs Losses
Losses109 · Games = 6 · +9.3 vs Wins