Usage Score
25.4
Player Dossier
2013-2015Ole Miss
Laquon Treadwell
WR • 6'2" • Crete, IL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Laquon Treadwell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.2
Consistency
71.6
Season Value
70.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Ole Miss
1313141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Laquon Treadwell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Ole Miss. Laquon Treadwell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 1,153 primary output with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Ole Miss
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
88.7
Efficiency
85.2
Usage
25.4
Consistency
71.6
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 71. Unknown: 44. Fresno State: 73. Alabama: 80. Vanderbilt: 135. Florida: 42. New Mexico State: 136. Memphis: 144. Texas A&M: 102. Auburn: 114. Arkansas: 132. LSU: 58. Mississippi State: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 6 by 78.9. Unknown: 4 by 73.3. Fresno State: 5 by 97.3. Alabama: 5 by 100. Vanderbilt: 8 by 100. Florida: 5 by 56. New Mexico State: 8 by 100. Memphis: 14 by 68.6. Texas A&M: 5 by 100. Auburn: 7 by 100. Arkansas: 7 by 100. LSU: 4 by 96.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins87.9 · n=9 · -18.1 vs Losses
Losses106 · n=3 · +18.1 vs Wins
First Half83 · n=7 · -12.3 vs Second Half
Second Half95.3 · n=6 · +12.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Oklahoma State2+ TD | W 48-20 | — | 6 | 71 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 3 | 34 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Mississippi State | W 38-27 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs LSU | W 38-17 | — | 4 | 58 | 10.6 | 14.50 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Arkansas100 receiving yards | L 52-53 | — | 7 | 132 | 18.9 | 18.90 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Auburn100 receiving yards | W 27-19 | — | 7 | 114 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Texas A&M100 receiving yards | W 23-3 | — | 5 | 102 | 20.4 | 20.40 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-37 | — | 14 | 144 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs New Mexico State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-3 | — | 8 | 136 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 37 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Florida | L 10-38 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-16 | — | 8 | 135 | 16.9 | 16.90 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ Alabama | W 43-37 | — | 5 | 80 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Fresno State | W 73-21 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Ole Miss | 608 | 60.6 | 22.7 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 608 | 60.6 | 22.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 632 | 79.6 | 26.4 | 24 |
| 2015 Postseason | Ole Miss | 1,153 | 85.2 | 25.4 | 521 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1,153 | 85.2 | 25.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135
Primary metric
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico State
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Memphis
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
132
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Boise State
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Ole Miss
1,153 primary output · 85.2 efficiency · 25.4 usage
70.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Ole Miss
70.1
1,153 primary · 85.2 efficiency · 25.4 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Ole Miss
54.9
632 primary · 79.6 efficiency · 26.4 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9925
Crete-Monee · Crete, IL
- Committed To
- Ole Miss
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,393
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.