Player Stats

Shock Linwood College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
4,399
Rushing yards
4,213
Receiving yards
186
Touchdowns
37

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2013 PostseasonBaylor1222193055.3
2013 Regular SeasonBaylor1287886216855.3
2014 PostseasonBaylor13402614074.9
2014 Regular SeasonBaylor131,3021,226761674.9
2015 Regular SeasonBaylor121,4001,329711176.6
2016 Regular SeasonBaylor117577516251.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Baylor paired 1,400 primary output with 67.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 49.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Baylor

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

68.8

Efficiency

49.3

Usage

18.2

Consistency

49.3

Best Game by takeover score

Iowa State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northwestern State: 97. SMU: 63. Rice: 57. Oklahoma State: 4. Iowa State: 237. Kansas: 46. Texas: 67. TCU: 27. Kansas State: 112. Texas Tech: 18. West Virginia: 29

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern State: 9 by 94.9. SMU: 19 by 34.3. Rice: 13 by 45.7. Oklahoma State: 2 by 20.8. Iowa State: 25 by 89.5. Kansas: 10 by 47.9. Texas: 17 by 41.1. TCU: 6 by 46.9. Kansas State: 25 by 47.3. Texas Tech: 8 by 23.4. West Virginia: 6 by 50.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins84 · Games = 6 · +33.4 vs Losses
Losses50.6 · Games = 5 · -33.4 vs Wins