Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Baylor paired 1,017 primary output with 68 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Baylor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Postseason | Baylor | 11 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 53.3 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Baylor | 11 | 542 | 526 | 16 | 6 | 53.3 |
| 2015 Postseason | Baylor | 11 | 299 | 299 | 0 | 3 | 66.9 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Baylor | 11 | 718 | 701 | 17 | 5 | 66.9 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Baylor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Baylor paired 1,017 primary output with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
92.5
Efficiency
68
Usage
16.4
Consistency
52.8
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 299. SMU: 28. Lamar: 121. Rice: 97. Texas Tech: 39. Kansas: 81. West Virginia: 19. Iowa State: 27. Oklahoma State: 62. TCU: 82. Texas: 162
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 23 by 100. SMU: 2 by 100. Lamar: 12 by 92. Rice: 10 by 90.4. Texas Tech: 12 by 33.9. Kansas: 17 by 52.8. West Virginia: 7 by 28.3. Iowa State: 4 by 70.3. Oklahoma State: 17 by 38. TCU: 12 by 71.2. Texas: 24 by 71.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.