Usage Score
28.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017NC State
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
WR • 6'5" • 209 lbs • St. Petersburg, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Marquez Valdes-Scantling reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.3
Consistency
53.5
Season Value
64.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · South Florida
1314141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- NC State • South Florida
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marquez Valdes-Scantling, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · South Florida. Marquez Valdes-Scantling reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
South Florida paired 879 primary output with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across NC State, South Florida.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · South Florida
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
73.3
Efficiency
75.3
Usage
28.4
Consistency
53.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 133. Unknown: 15. San José State: 91. Illinois: 96. Temple: 26. East Carolina: 94. Cincinnati: 19. Tulane: 41. Houston: 186. UConn: 152. Tulsa: 17. UCF: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 3 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 25. San José State: 6 by 100. Illinois: 4 by 100. Temple: 2 by 86.7. East Carolina: 6 by 100. Cincinnati: 3 by 42.2. Tulane: 3 by 91.1. Houston: 10 by 100. UConn: 6 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 28.3. UCF: 2 by 30
Split Comparison
Wins74.3 · n=9 · -23.2 vs Losses
Losses97.5 · n=2 · +23.2 vs Wins
First Half75.8 · n=6 · +5.2 vs Second Half
Second Half70.7 · n=6 · -5.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/23 | vs Texas Tech100 receiving yards | W 38-34 | — | 3 | 133 | 44.3 | 44.30 | 1 | 64 |
| Fri 11/24 | @ UCF | L 42-49 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 11/17 | vs Tulsa | W 27-20 | — | 4 | 17 | 3.2 | 4.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ UConn100 receiving yards | W 37-20 | — | 6 | 152 | 25.3 | 25.30 | 1 | 95 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Houston100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-28 | — | 10 | 186 | 17.5 | 18.60 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Tulane | W 34-28 | — | 3 | 41 | 10.2 | 13.70 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Cincinnati | W 33-3 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ East Carolina | W 61-31 | — | 6 | 94 | 21.8 | 15.70 | 1 | 35 |
| Thu 9/21 | vs Temple | W 43-7 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 9/15 | vs Illinois | W 47-23 | — | 4 | 96 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 3.80 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 8/26 | @ San José State | W 42-22 | — | 6 | 91 | 13.4 | 15.20 | 0 | 50 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
NC State
2013-2014
Opening stop
- 2
South Florida
2015-2017
Final stop
Season Progression
20132014201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | NC State | 281 | 75.8 | 15.1 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | NC State | 257 | 74.1 | 12.8 | -24 |
| 2014 Regular Season | NC State | 257 | 74.1 | 12.8 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | South Florida | 0 | — | — | -257 |
| 2016 Postseason | South Florida | 415 | 88.3 | 12.2 | 415 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Florida | 415 | 88.3 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | South Florida | 879 | 75.3 | 28.4 | 464 |
| 2017 Regular Season | South Florida | 879 | 75.3 | 28.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
186
Primary metric
186 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
55
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
79
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · South Florida
879 primary output · 75.3 efficiency · 28.4 usage
64.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · South Florida
64.3
879 primary · 75.3 efficiency · 28.4 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · South Florida
49.4
415 primary · 88.3 efficiency · 12.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8142
Lakewood · St. Petersburg, FL
- Committed To
- NC State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,832
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.