Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2013-2017NC State
Jerod Fernandez
LB • 6'0" • 224 lbs • Sanford, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jerod Fernandez shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
39.6
Consistency
42.9
Season Value
26.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · NC State
13141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- NC State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerod Fernandez, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · NC State. Jerod Fernandez shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
NC State paired 2 primary output with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 39.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · NC State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
39.6
Usage
11
Consistency
42.9
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 2. South Carolina: 0.5. Marshall: 0.5. Unknown: 0.5. Florida State: 0.5. Syracuse: 0. Louisville: 0. Pittsburgh: 1. Notre Dame: 1.5. Clemson: 1.5. Boston College: 2. Wake Forest: 1. North Carolina: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 5 by 40.8. South Carolina: 9 by 42.5. Marshall: 7 by 34.2. Unknown: 5 by 25.8. Florida State: 9 by 42.5. Syracuse: 14 by 50. Louisville: 7 by 29.2. Pittsburgh: 5 by 30.8. Notre Dame: 13 by 65. Clemson: 4 by 31.7. Boston College: 11 by 65.8. Wake Forest: 4 by 26.7. North Carolina: 6 by 30
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=8 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · n=4 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=7 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ Arizona State | W 52-31 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs North Carolina | W 33-21 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | @ Wake Forest | L 24-30 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Boston College10+ tackles | W 17-14 | 11 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Clemson | L 31-38 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Notre Dame10+ tackles | L 14-35 | 13 | 7 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Pittsburgh | W 35-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/6 | vs Louisville | W 39-25 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Syracuse10+ tackles | W 33-25 | 14 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Florida State | W 27-21 | 9 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Marshall | W 37-20 | 7 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ South Carolina | L 28-35 | 9 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
NC State
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | NC State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | NC State | 2 | 40 | — | 2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | NC State | 2 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | NC State | 9 | 35.5 | 7.8 | 7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | NC State | 9 | 35.5 | 7.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | NC State | 11.5 | 39.6 | 11 | 2.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | NC State | 11.5 | 39.6 | 11 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
North Carolina
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
South Alabama
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Boston College
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.5 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · NC State
2 primary output · 40 efficiency · — usage
47.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · NC State
40.7
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2017 Postseason · NC State
26.4
11.5 primary · 39.6 efficiency · 11 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
2
Splash games
6
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8264
Lake Mary · Lake Mary, FL
- Committed To
- NC State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
188
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.