Usage Score
13
Player Dossier
2013-2015North Texas
WR • 6'1" • 180 lbs • Missouri City, TX, USA
Darvin Kidsy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13
Efficiency
65.6
Consistency
25.8
Season Value
50.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darvin Kidsy, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · North Texas. Darvin Kidsy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
North Texas paired 240 primary output with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
24
Efficiency
65.6
Usage
13
Consistency
25.8
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 12. Rice: 0. Iowa: 6. Southern Miss: 6. Unknown: 0. Western Kentucky: 93. Marshall: 44. UTSA: 5. Louisiana Tech: 21. Middle Tennessee: 53
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 1 by 80. Iowa: 1 by 40. Southern Miss: 1 by 40. Western Kentucky: 3 by 100. Marshall: 4 by 73.3. UTSA: 1 by 33.3. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 70. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 88.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/21 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 7-41 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 13-56 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs UTSA | W 30-23 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Marshall | L 13-30 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 22 |
| Thu 10/15 | vs Western Kentucky | L 28-55 | — | 3 | 93 | 31 | 31 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Southern Miss | L 14-49 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Iowa | L 16-62 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Rice | L 24-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | @ SMU | L 13-31 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | North Texas | 151 | 56.6 | 8.4 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | North Texas | 148 | 56.2 | 12.1 | -3 |
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 240 | 65.6 | 13 | 92 |
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93
Primary metric
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · North Texas
240 primary output · 65.6 efficiency · 13 usage
50.8
#2
2014 Regular Season · North Texas
41.1
148 primary · 56.2 efficiency · 12.1 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · North Texas
39.8
151 primary · 56.6 efficiency · 8.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7747
Elkins · Missouri City, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
539
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Darvin Kidsy quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit