Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2013-2016Texas A&M
LB • 6'3" • Alexandria, LA, USA
Shaan Washington shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.4
Efficiency
44.9
Consistency
29.8
Season Value
24.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shaan Washington, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M. Shaan Washington shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.9 disruption score.
Shaan Washington played LB for Texas A&M. Across 4 tracked seasons, Shaan Washington recorded 104 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 15 primary output with 44.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 44.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
44.9
Usage
8.4
Consistency
29.8
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 1. UCLA: 2. Unknown: 5. Auburn: 1. Arkansas: 0.5. South Carolina: 3. Tennessee: 0. Alabama: 0.5. New Mexico State: 0. Mississippi State: 0.5. Ole Miss: 1. UTSA: 0. LSU: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 11 by 55.8. UCLA: 8 by 53.3. Unknown: 5 by 70.8. Auburn: 9 by 47.5. Arkansas: 5 by 25.8. South Carolina: 11 by 75.8. Tennessee: 7 by 29.2. Alabama: 11 by 50.8. New Mexico State: 1 by 4.2. Mississippi State: 8 by 38.3. Ole Miss: 7 by 39.2. UTSA: 10 by 41.7. LSU: 11 by 50.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
75.8 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Kansas State10+ tackles | L 28-33 | 11 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | vs LSU10+ tackles | L 39-54 | 11 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UTSA10+ tackles | W 23-10 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Ole Miss | L 28-29 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Mississippi State | L 28-35 | 8 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs New Mexico State | W 52-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Alabama10+ tackles | L 14-33 | 11 | 7 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Tennessee | W 45-38 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ South Carolina10+ tackles · Splash game | W 24-13 | 11 | 7 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Arkansas | W 45-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Auburn | W 29-16 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 5 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UCLA | W 31-24 | 8 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 15 | 44.9 | 8.4 | 15 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 15 | 44.9 | 8.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#2
South Carolina
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.8 takeover score.
#3
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 34.8 takeover score.
#4
Kansas State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 29.5 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 25.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
15 primary output · 44.9 efficiency · 8.4 usage
24.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
24.7
15 primary · 44.9 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Texas A&M
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
5
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8531
Alexandria · Alexandria, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
104
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.