Usage Score
22.6
Player Dossier
2013-2016Texas A&M
LaQuvionte Gonzalez
WR • 5'10" • Cedar Hill, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
LaQuvionte Gonzalez reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.7
Consistency
50.6
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Kansas
13131416
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • Kansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
LaQuvionte Gonzalez, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Kansas. LaQuvionte Gonzalez reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Kansas paired 729 primary output with 68.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Kansas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Kansas
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
60.8
Efficiency
68.7
Usage
22.6
Consistency
50.6
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 78. Ohio: 45. Memphis: 44. Texas Tech: 51. TCU: 131. Baylor: 29. Oklahoma State: 106. Oklahoma: 20. West Virginia: 18. Iowa State: 39. Texas: 41. Kansas State: 127
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 7 by 74.3. Ohio: 5 by 60. Memphis: 6 by 48.9. Texas Tech: 5 by 68. TCU: 8 by 100. Baylor: 5 by 38.7. Oklahoma State: 6 by 100. Oklahoma: 2 by 66.7. West Virginia: 3 by 40. Iowa State: 7 by 37.1. Texas: 3 by 91.1. Kansas State: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses61 · n=10
First Half63 · n=6 · +4.5 vs Second Half
Second Half58.5 · n=6 · -4.5 vs First Half
All Games60.8 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Kansas State100 receiving yards | L 19-34 | — | 5 | 127 | 25.4 | 25.40 | 1 | 95 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Texas | W 24-21 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Iowa State | L 24-31 | — | 7 | 39 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ West Virginia | L 21-48 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Oklahoma | L 3-56 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Oklahoma State100 receiving yards | L 20-44 | — | 6 | 106 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Baylor | L 7-49 | — | 5 | 29 | 3.7 | 5.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs TCU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-24 | — | 8 | 131 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 0 | 67 |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Texas Tech | L 19-55 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Memphis | L 7-43 | — | 6 | 44 | 5.9 | 7.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Ohio | L 21-37 | — | 5 | 45 | 7.7 | 9 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 78 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 1 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2013-2014
Opening stop
- 2
Kansas
2016
Final stop
Season Progression
2013201320142016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Texas A&M | 240 | 68.2 | 8.7 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 240 | 68.2 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 77 | 85.6 | 9.7 | -163 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kansas | 729 | 68.7 | 22.6 | 652 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
TCU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
131
Primary metric
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas State
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
45
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma State
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UTEP
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Kansas
729 primary output · 68.7 efficiency · 22.6 usage
60.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Texas A&M
42.5
77 primary · 85.6 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
40.4
240 primary · 68.2 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9314
Cedar Hill · Cedar Hill, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,046
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.