Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2013-2016Texas A&M
Jeremy Tabuyo
WR • 5'11" • Honolulu, HI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jeremy Tabuyo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
55.9
Season Value
60.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
131414151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Tabuyo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M. Jeremy Tabuyo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 229 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
32.7
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
8.9
Consistency
55.9
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 14. UCLA: 20. Unknown: 40. South Carolina: 89. Alabama: 33. New Mexico State: 29. UTSA: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 2 by 46.7. UCLA: 2 by 66.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. South Carolina: 4 by 100. Alabama: 1 by 100. New Mexico State: 2 by 96.7. UTSA: 1 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Wins35.5 · n=4 · +12 vs Losses
Losses23.5 · n=2 · -12 vs Wins
First Half40.8 · n=4 · +18.8 vs Second Half
Second Half22 · n=3 · -18.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Alabama
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 21 | 27.8 | 7 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Texas A&M | 102 | 41.1 | 5.2 | 81 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 102 | 41.1 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 102 | 76.9 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 229 | 76.7 | 8.9 | 127 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 229 | 76.7 | 8.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89
Primary metric
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
53
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 70.7 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
40
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
229 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 8.9 usage
60.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
60.4
229 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 8.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
47
102 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 9.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8117
Southfield · Southfield, MI
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
454
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.