Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2013-2016Texas A&M
Daeshon Hall
DL • 6'6" • Seattle, WA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Daeshon Hall shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.5
Consistency
45.2
Season Value
30.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Texas A&M
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Daeshon Hall, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Daeshon Hall shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
31.5
Usage
8.3
Consistency
45.2
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 2.5. UCLA: 1.5. Unknown: 1.5. Auburn: 1. Arkansas: 2. South Carolina: 5.5. Tennessee: 2. Alabama: 0.5. Mississippi State: 0. Ole Miss: 1. UTSA: 0. LSU: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 4 by 41.7. UCLA: 4 by 31.7. Unknown: 3 by 27.5. Auburn: 5 by 30.8. Arkansas: 4 by 36.7. South Carolina: 6 by 75. Tennessee: 2 by 28.3. Alabama: 6 by 30. Mississippi State: 7 by 29.2. Ole Miss: 5 by 30.8. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins2 · n=6 · +1.2 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · n=5 · -1.2 vs Wins
First Half2.3 · n=6 · +1.8 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=6 · -1.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
75 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Kansas StateSplash game | L 28-33 | 4 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | vs LSU | L 39-54 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UTSA | W 23-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Ole Miss | L 28-29 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Mississippi State | L 28-35 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Alabama | L 14-33 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Tennessee | W 45-38 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ South Carolina2+ sacks · Splash game | W 24-13 | 6 | 4 | — | 3.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Arkansas | W 45-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Auburn | W 29-16 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UCLA | W 31-24 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 17.5 | 31.5 | 8.3 | 17.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 17.5 | 31.5 | 8.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5
Primary metric
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.9 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Kansas State
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 33.8 takeover score.
#4
Arkansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 28.3 takeover score.
#5
Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 23.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Texas A&M
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.7
#2
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
30.6
17.5 primary · 31.5 efficiency · 8.3 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
30.6
17.5 primary · 31.5 efficiency · 8.3 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9287
Lancaster · Lancaster, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
50
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.