Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Virginia Tech paired 92 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 7 | - | 0 | 0 | 50.6 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 7 | 6 | 47 | 0 | 50.6 |
| 2017 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 8 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 55.6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 8 | 7 | 83 | 0 | 55.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Virginia Tech paired 92 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ohio State, Virginia Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
11.5
Efficiency
60
Usage
7.3
Consistency
38.2
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 9. West Virginia: 0. Delaware: 8. East Carolina: 34. North Carolina: 22. Miami: 16. Pittsburgh: 3. Virginia: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 1 by 60. Delaware: 1 by 53.3. East Carolina: 1 by 100. North Carolina: 2 by 73.3. Miami: 2 by 53.3. Pittsburgh: 1 by 20
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.