Player Dossier

2013-2017

Ohio State

Marcus Baugh

TE • 6'5" • 250 lbs • Riverside, CA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Marcus Baugh reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

11.6

Efficiency

69.4

Consistency

65

Season Value

61.5

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Ohio State

13141515161717

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Ohio State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Marcus Baugh, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Ohio State. Marcus Baugh reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Marcus Baugh played TE for Ohio State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Marcus Baugh recorded 5 rushing yards, 607 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Ohio State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season

Ohio State paired 269 primary output with 75.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 69.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Ohio State

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

21.7

Efficiency

69.4

Usage

11.6

Consistency

65

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. USC: 40. Indiana: 16. Oklahoma: 13. Army: 36. UNLV: 4. Rutgers: 19. Maryland: 10. Nebraska: 43. Penn State: 20. Iowa: 15. Michigan State: 30. Illinois: 12. Michigan: 25. Wisconsin: 21

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 4 by 66.7. Indiana: 2 by 53.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 86.7. Army: 2 by 100. UNLV: 1 by 26.7. Rutgers: 3 by 42.2. Maryland: 1 by 66.7. Nebraska: 3 by 95.6. Penn State: 2 by 66.7. Iowa: 2 by 50. Michigan State: 3 by 66.7. Illinois: 1 by 80. Michigan: 1 by 100. Wisconsin: 2 by 70

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins23 · Games = 12 · +9 vs Losses
Losses14 · Games = 2 · -9 vs Wins
First Half19.7 · Games = 7 · -4 vs Second Half
Second Half23.7 · Games = 7 · +4 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

14 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Nebraska

Best efficiency game

100 vs Michigan

Result
Sat 12/30vs USCW 24-74401010020
Sun 12/3@ WisconsinW 27-2122110.510.50013
Sat 11/25@ MichiganW 31-201252525125
Sat 11/18vs IllinoisW 52-141121212112
Sat 11/11vs Michigan StateW 48-33308.810017
Sat 11/4@ IowaL 24-552157.57.50010
Sat 10/28vs Penn StateW 39-382201010116
Sat 10/14@ NebraskaW 56-1434314.314.30121
Sat 10/7vs MarylandW 62-141101010110
Sat 9/30@ RutgersW 56-03196.36.3009
Sat 9/23vs UNLVW 54-21144404
Sat 9/16vs ArmyW 38-72361818031
Sat 9/9vs OklahomaL 16-311131313013
Fri 9/1@ IndianaW 49-2121688015

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Ohio State

    2013-2017

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2013201420152015201620172017
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2013 Regular SeasonOhio State0
2014 Regular SeasonOhio State213.342
2015 PostseasonOhio State3266.75.630
2015 Regular SeasonOhio State3266.75.60
2016 Regular SeasonOhio State26975.811.9237
2017 PostseasonOhio State30469.411.635
2017 Regular SeasonOhio State30469.411.60

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Notre Dame

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

27

Primary metric

27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Nebraska

43

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.

#3

USC

40

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

40 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.

#4

Penn State

55

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

55 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.

#5

Army

36

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2016 Regular Season · Ohio State

269 primary output · 75.8 efficiency · 11.9 usage

64.2

#2

2017 Postseason · Ohio State

61.5

304 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 11.6 usage

#3

2017 Regular Season · Ohio State

61.5

304 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 11.6 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2013 · Rating 0.9614

John W. North · Riverside, CA

Committed To
Ohio State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2013

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

607

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.