Usage / Role
30%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2017Ohio State
TE • 6'5" • 250 lbs • Riverside, CA, USA
Marcus Baugh reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
30%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
38
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
38
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Ohio State
Snapshot
Player Story
Marcus Baugh built his college career from 2013 through 2017 as a tight end from Riverside, CA wearing No. 85, spending time with Ohio State. The clearest part of Marcus Baugh's career was his receiving role: 55...
Read the storyMarcus Baugh, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Ohio State. Marcus Baugh reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 31.8 |
| 2015 Postseason | Ohio State | 2 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 39.1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 39.1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 10 | 24 | 269 | 2 | 68.9 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 14 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 68.2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 14 | 24 | 264 | 5 | 68.2 |
Related Context
Marcus Baugh played TE for Ohio State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Marcus Baugh recorded 5 rushing yards, 607 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Ohio State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Ohio State paired 269 primary output with 75.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
21.7
Efficiency
69.4
Usage
11.6
Consistency
65
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 40. Indiana: 16. Oklahoma: 13. Army: 36. UNLV: 4. Rutgers: 19. Maryland: 10. Nebraska: 43. Penn State: 20. Iowa: 15. Michigan State: 30. Illinois: 12. Michigan: 25. Wisconsin: 21
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 4 by 66.7. Indiana: 2 by 53.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 86.7. Army: 2 by 100. UNLV: 1 by 26.7. Rutgers: 3 by 42.2. Maryland: 1 by 66.7. Nebraska: 3 by 95.6. Penn State: 2 by 66.7. Iowa: 2 by 50. Michigan State: 3 by 66.7. Illinois: 1 by 80. Michigan: 1 by 100. Wisconsin: 2 by 70
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | vs USC | W 24-7 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 12/3 | @ Wisconsin | W 27-21 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Michigan | W 31-20 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Illinois | W 52-14 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Michigan State | W 48-3 | — | 3 | 30 | 8.8 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Iowa | L 24-55 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Penn State | W 39-38 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Nebraska | W 56-14 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Maryland | W 62-14 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Rutgers | W 56-0 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs UNLV | W 54-21 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Army | W 38-7 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Oklahoma | L 16-31 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 9/1 | @ Indiana | W 49-21 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
Player Story
Marcus Baugh built his college career from 2013 through 2017 as a tight end from Riverside, CA wearing No. 85, spending time with Ohio State. The clearest part of Marcus Baugh's career was his receiving role: 55 catches, 607 receiving yards, 8 touchdowns, and 5 rushing yards across 27 career games in the available record. His career also includes 5 rushing yards and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Marcus Baugh's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio State | 2 | 13.3 | 4 | 2 |
| 2015 Postseason | Ohio State | 32 | 66.7 | 5.6 | 30 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 32 | 66.7 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 269 | 75.8 | 11.9 | 237 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 304 | 69.4 | 11.6 | 35 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 304 | 69.4 | 11.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs USC
Week 1 · W 24-7 · Postseason
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40
Receiving Yards
86.6 takeover
40 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#2
@ Penn State
Week 8 · L 21-24 · Conference game
55
Receiving Yards
77.7 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
@ Nebraska
Week 7 · W 56-14 · Conference game
43
Receiving Yards
76 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#4
vs Notre Dame
Week 1 · W 44-28 · Postseason
27
Receiving Yards
72.6 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Army
Week 3 · W 38-7
36
Receiving Yards
68.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Ohio State
269 primary output · 75.8 efficiency · 11.9 usage
68.9
#2
2017 Postseason · Ohio State
68.2
304 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Ohio State
68.2
304 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 11.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.