Player Stats

Bruce Hector College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
71
TFL
21
Sacks
13
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonSouth Florida00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonSouth Florida00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonSouth Florida00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonSouth Florida10532--044.6
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Florida102854-1044.6
2017 PostseasonSouth Florida123-01-068.3
2017 Regular SeasonSouth Florida1235137-1068.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

South Florida paired 22 primary output with 31.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 31.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · South Florida

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.8

Efficiency

31.5

Usage

9.6

Consistency

61.7

Best Game by takeover score

East Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 1. Stony Brook: 3. San José State: 1. Illinois: 3. Temple: 0. East Carolina: 4. Cincinnati: 2. Tulane: 2. Houston: 0. UConn: 3. Tulsa: 3. UCF: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 3 by 22.5. Stony Brook: 4 by 46.7. San José State: 5 by 30.8. Illinois: 2 by 38.3. Temple: 1 by 4.2. East Carolina: 3 by 52.5. Cincinnati: 3 by 32.5. Tulane: 4 by 36.7. Houston: 1 by 4.2. UConn: 4 by 46.7. Tulsa: 6 by 55. UCF: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.2 · Games = 10 · +2.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · -2.2 vs Wins