Player Stats

Jahad Thomas College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,597
Rushing yards
2,599
Receiving yards
998
Touchdowns
39

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonTemple8000050
2014 Regular SeasonTemple12748384364147.4
2015 PostseasonTemple14550075.8
2015 Regular SeasonTemple141,4731,2572161975.8
2016 PostseasonTemple122735-8078.9
2016 Regular SeasonTemple121,3449184261978.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Temple paired 1,371 primary output with 51.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 51.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati

Win with 169 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Temple

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

114.3

Efficiency

51.6

Usage

33.6

Consistency

75.2

Best Game by takeover score

Cincinnati

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 27. Penn State: 100. Charlotte: 117. SMU: 80. Memphis: 158. UCF: 153. South Florida: 68. Cincinnati: 169. UConn: 156. Tulane: 103. East Carolina: 154. Navy: 86

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 8 by 45.3. Penn State: 20 by 44. Charlotte: 18 by 55.4. SMU: 16 by 52.1. Memphis: 19 by 52.4. UCF: 30 by 49. South Florida: 18 by 37.6. Cincinnati: 20 by 85.2. UConn: 21 by 61.5. Tulane: 24 by 34.1. East Carolina: 25 by 65.3. Navy: 21 by 37.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins120.7 · Games = 9 · +25.7 vs Losses
Losses95 · Games = 3 · -25.7 vs Wins