Player Stats

Phillip Walker College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
11,432
Passing yards
10,669
Rushing yards
763
Touchdowns
83

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonTemple92,4162,0843322370
2014 Regular SeasonTemple122,6412,3173241672.6
2015 PostseasonTemple1426623630067.1
2015 Regular SeasonTemple142,9142,7371772167.1
2016 PostseasonTemple14342396-54264.5
2016 Regular SeasonTemple142,8532,899-462164.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

Temple paired 2,641 primary output with 55.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 57.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Temple

Games

14

Primary Metric / G

228.2

Efficiency

57.6

Usage

13.7

Consistency

69.7

Best Game by takeover score

Memphis

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 342. Army: 149. Stony Brook: 113. Penn State: 273. Charlotte: 286. SMU: 98. Memphis: 475. UCF: 150. South Florida: 198. Cincinnati: 210. UConn: 209. Tulane: 345. East Carolina: 158. Navy: 189

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 56 by 54.1. Army: 30 by 38.5. Stony Brook: 27 by 43.8. Penn State: 42 by 58. Charlotte: 28 by 83.4. SMU: 21 by 38. Memphis: 69 by 60.1. UCF: 30 by 47.8. South Florida: 24 by 62.4. Cincinnati: 28 by 65.7. UConn: 23 by 55.4. Tulane: 36 by 66.6. East Carolina: 20 by 75.3. Navy: 26 by 57.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins195.6 · Games = 10 · -114.2 vs Losses
Losses309.8 · Games = 4 · +114.2 vs Wins