Usage Score
30.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Memphis
Anthony Miller
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Memphis, TN, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Anthony Miller reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.8
Consistency
57.8
Season Value
67.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis
1314151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Miller, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis. Anthony Miller reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Memphis paired 1,434 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Memphis
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
112.5
Efficiency
83.8
Usage
30.4
Consistency
57.8
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 55. UL Monroe: 23. UCLA: 185. Unknown: 47. UCF: 37. UConn: 224. Navy: 90. Houston: 178. Tulane: 75. Tulsa: 46. SMU: 163. East Carolina: 144. UCF: 195
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 4 by 91.7. UL Monroe: 2 by 76.7. UCLA: 9 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 52.2. UCF: 3 by 82.2. UConn: 15 by 99.6. Navy: 10 by 60. Houston: 10 by 100. Tulane: 6 by 83.3. Tulsa: 6 by 51.1. SMU: 8 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 100. UCF: 14 by 92.9
Split Comparison
Wins125.3 · n=9 · +29.7 vs Losses
Losses95.7 · n=3 · -29.7 vs Wins
First Half94.4 · n=7 · -39.1 vs Second Half
Second Half133.5 · n=6 · +39.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | vs Iowa State | L 20-21 | — | 4 | 55 | 10.6 | 13.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 12/2 | @ UCF100 receiving yards · High volume | L 55-62 | — | 14 | 195 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 3 | 68 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards | W 70-13 | — | 3 | 144 | 48 | 48 | 1 | 89 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs SMU100 receiving yards · High volume | W 66-45 | — | 8 | 163 | 16.9 | 20.40 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Tulsa | W 41-14 | — | 6 | 46 | 6.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Tulane | W 56-26 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 21 |
| Fri 10/20 | @ Houston100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-38 | — | 10 | 178 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs NavyHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 30-27 | — | 10 | 90 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 28 |
| Fri 10/6 | @ UConn100 receiving yards · High volume | W 70-31 | — | 15 | 224 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 4 | 40 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ UCF | L 13-40 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 47 | 5.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-45 | — | 9 | 185 | 17.7 | 20.60 | 2 | 41 |
| Fri 9/1 | vs UL Monroe | W 37-29 | — | 2 | 23 | 9.3 | 11.50 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Memphis | 694 | 73 | 15.9 | 694 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Memphis | 694 | 73 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Memphis | 1,434 | 83.9 | 30.1 | 740 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 1,434 | 83.9 | 30.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Memphis | 1,462 | 83.8 | 30.4 | 28 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Memphis | 1,462 | 83.8 | 30.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
250
Primary metric
250 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
224
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
224 receiving yards with a 99.6 efficiency score.
#3
UCF
195
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
195 receiving yards with a 92.9 efficiency score.
#4
UCLA
185
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
185 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Cincinnati
156
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Memphis
1,434 primary output · 83.9 efficiency · 30.1 usage
69.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Memphis
69.6
1,434 primary · 83.9 efficiency · 30.1 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Memphis
67.5
1,462 primary · 83.8 efficiency · 30.4 usage
Milestones
17
100+ receiving yards
14
8+ catch outings
9
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.7919
St. Vincent-St. Mary · Akron, OH
- Committed To
- Akron
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,590
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.