Player Stats

Doroland Dorceus College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,410
Rushing yards
2,082
Receiving yards
328
Touchdowns
28

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonMemphis81731730038.1
2014 Regular SeasonMemphis4235237-2448.9
2015 PostseasonMemphis1348480063.8
2015 Regular SeasonMemphis138306132171163.8
2016 PostseasonMemphis1335278071.2
2016 Regular SeasonMemphis13852783691071.2
2017 Regular SeasonMemphis723720136328.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Memphis paired 887 primary output with 61.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 43.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UConn

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · Memphis

Games

7

Scrimmage Yards / G

33.9

Efficiency

43.7

Usage

9.5

Consistency

17.4

Best Game by takeover score

UConn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UL Monroe: 7. UCF: 13. UConn: 150. Tulane: 0. Tulsa: 8. SMU: 8. East Carolina: 51

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UL Monroe: 2 by 36.5. UCF: 4 by 29.2. UConn: 24 by 60.7. Tulsa: 2 by 41.7. SMU: 3 by 27.8. East Carolina: 8 by 66.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins37.3 · Games = 6 · +24.3 vs Losses
Losses13 · Games = 1 · -24.3 vs Wins