Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2013-2018Memphis
? • 6'0" • 210 lbs • Olive Branch, MS, USA
Sam Craft shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
5.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Memphis
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sam Craft, ?. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Memphis. Sam Craft shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Sam Craft played ? for Memphis. Across 6 tracked seasons, Sam Craft recorded 810 rushing yards, 699 receiving yards, and 18 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Memphis.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Memphis paired 7 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 0. UConn: 0. Houston: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
— vs Wake Forest
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Memphis
2013-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Memphis | 6 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Memphis | 3 | — | — | -3 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Memphis | 3 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Memphis | 7 | — | — | 4 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Memphis | 7 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 1 | — | — | -6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Memphis | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Memphis | 1 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Temple
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Cincinnati
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
UCLA
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Cincinnati
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Memphis
7 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
7.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Memphis
7.7
7 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Memphis
6.7
6 primary · — efficiency · — usage
8
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8244
Olive Branch · Memphis, TN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
18
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.