Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2014-2017App State
Dante Jones
WR • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Raleigh, NC, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Dante Jones reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
39.6
Consistency
61.9
Season Value
52.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · App State
1415161617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- App State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dante Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · App State. Dante Jones reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Dante Jones played WR for App State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Dante Jones recorded 241 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with App State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
App State paired 94 primary output with 64.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 39.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · App State
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
9.7
Efficiency
39.6
Usage
8.9
Consistency
61.9
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 18. Texas State: 0. Wake Forest: 8. Coastal Carolina: 17. Massachusetts: 4. UL Monroe: 8. Georgia Southern: 8. Georgia State: 6. Louisiana: 18
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 3 by 40. Texas State: 1 by 0. Wake Forest: 2 by 26.7. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 56.7. Massachusetts: 1 by 26.7. UL Monroe: 1 by 53.3. Georgia Southern: 1 by 53.3. Georgia State: 1 by 40. Louisiana: 2 by 60
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins9.8 · Games = 5 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses9.5 · Games = 4 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half9.4 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half10 · Games = 4 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana
Best efficiency game
60 vs Louisiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/2 | vs Louisiana | W 63-14 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Georgia State | W 31-10 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 11/10 | vs Georgia Southern | W 27-6 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ UL Monroe | L 45-52 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Massachusetts | L 27-30 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 37-29 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Wake Forest | L 19-20 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Texas State | W 20-13 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Georgia | L 10-31 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
App State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | App State | 25 | 83.3 | 11.8 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | App State | 35 | 86.7 | 6.3 | 10 |
| 2016 Postseason | App State | 94 | 64.8 | 9.7 | 59 |
| 2016 Regular Season | App State | 94 | 64.8 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | App State | 87 | 39.6 | 8.9 | -7 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24
Primary metric
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Southern
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · App State
94 primary output · 64.8 efficiency · 9.7 usage
58.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · App State
58.1
94 primary · 64.8 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · App State
55.8
25 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 11.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7667
Southeast Raleigh · Raleigh, NC
- Committed To
- App State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
241
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.