Usage Score
31.2
Player Dossier
2013-2016Texas State
Tyler Jones
QB • 6'2" • Stephenville, TX, USA
Pass-first distributorVolume operator
Tyler Jones is a pass-first distributor with 31.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
50
Consistency
50.3
Season Value
50
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Texas State
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Jones, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Texas State. Tyler Jones is a pass-first distributor with 31.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Texas State paired 3,209 primary output with 64.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 50 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 491 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Texas State
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
201.5
Efficiency
50
Usage
31.2
Consistency
50.3
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 429. Arkansas: 50. Houston: 102. Unknown: 491. Georgia State: 307. UL Monroe: 259. Louisiana: 159. App State: 173. Idaho: 152. New Mexico State: 102. Arkansas State: -8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 74 by 56.8. Arkansas: 36 by 38.4. Houston: 38 by 43.1. Unknown: 53 by 72.2. Georgia State: 56 by 50.3. UL Monroe: 46 by 59.3. Louisiana: 43 by 52.7. App State: 50 by 50.8. Idaho: 24 by 66.5. New Mexico State: 27 by 37.8. Arkansas State: 11 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Losses144 · n=9
First Half273 · n=6 · +157.4 vs Second Half
Second Half115.6 · n=5 · -157.4 vs First Half
All Games201.5 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
72.2 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/4 | vs Arkansas State | L 14-36 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 40.0 | 0 | 1 | 22.5 | 6 | -26 | -4.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ New Mexico State | L 10-50 | 13 | 22 | 97 | 59.1 | 0 | 3 | 37.8 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Idaho | L 14-47 | 12 | 16 | 175 | 75.0 | 1 | 0 | 66.5 | 8 | -23 | -2.90 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ App State | L 10-35 | 28 | 38 | 183 | 73.7 | 0 | 1 | 50.8 | 12 | -10 | -0.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Louisiana | L 3-27 | 20 | 28 | 142 | 71.4 | 0 | 1 | 52.7 | 15 | 17 | 1.10 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ UL MonroeDual-threat | L 34-40 | 19 | 35 | 193 | 54.3 | 0 | 2 | 59.3 | 11 | 66 | 6 | 2 | 39 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Georgia State300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 21-41 | 27 | 47 | 300 | 57.4 | 1 | 2 | 50.3 | 9 | 7 | 0.80 | 2 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Unknown300-yard game · 3+ TD | — | 31 | 40 | 475 | 77.5 | 5 | 0 | 72.2 | 13 | 16 | 1.20 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Houston | L 3-64 | 18 | 31 | 102 | 58.1 | 0 | 1 | 43.1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Arkansas | L 3-42 | 11 | 26 | 83 | 42.3 | 0 | 1 | 38.4 | 10 | -33 | -3.30 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Ohio300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 56-54 | 40 | 55 | 418 | 72.7 | 4 | 2 | 56.8 | 19 | 11 | 0.60 | 1 | 40 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas State | 1,387 | 59.2 | 29.1 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas State | 3,209 | 64.7 | 31.3 | 1,822 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas State | 3,077 | 61.7 | 30.6 | -132 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas State | 2,216 | 50 | 31.2 | -861 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
470
Primary metric
470 total offense with 78.1 efficiency.
#2
South Alabama
286
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
286 total offense with 61.6 efficiency.
#3
Unknown
491
Primary metric
Game with 491 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency.
491 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#4
Georgia State
332
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
332 total offense with 80.8 efficiency.
#5
Unknown
329
Primary metric
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
329 total offense with 90.4 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Texas State
3,209 primary output · 64.7 efficiency · 31.3 usage
69.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · Texas State
65.1
3,077 primary · 61.7 efficiency · 30.6 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Texas State
50
2,216 primary · 50 efficiency · 31.2 usage
Milestones
20
250+ passing yards
14
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
17
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7889
Stephenville · Stephenville, TX
- Committed To
- Texas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
9,889
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.