Player Dossier

2013-2015

South Carolina

Pharoh Cooper

WR • 5'11" • Havelock, NC, USA

Alpha targetExplosive finisher

Pharoh Cooper reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

33.2

Efficiency

82.8

Consistency

63

Season Value

64.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · South Carolina

1313141415

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
South Carolina
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Pharoh Cooper, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · South Carolina. Pharoh Cooper reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Pharoh Cooper played WR for South Carolina. Across 3 tracked seasons, Pharoh Cooper recorded 118 passing yards, 513 rushing yards, and 2,163 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2014 with South Carolina.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

South Carolina paired 973 primary output with 82.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 82.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Unknown

Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · South Carolina

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

81.1

Efficiency

82.8

Usage

33.2

Consistency

63

Best Game by takeover score

Clemson

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 45. Kentucky: 100. Georgia: 6. UCF: 69. Missouri: 102. LSU: 105. Vanderbilt: 160. Texas A&M: 22. Tennessee: 47. Florida: 40. Unknown: 191. Clemson: 86

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 3 by 100. Kentucky: 9 by 74.1. Georgia: 1 by 40. UCF: 4 by 100. Missouri: 9 by 75.6. LSU: 7 by 100. Vanderbilt: 7 by 100. Texas A&M: 4 by 36.7. Tennessee: 4 by 78.3. Florida: 3 by 88.9. Unknown: 11 by 100. Clemson: 4 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins91.3 · Games = 3 · +27.8 vs Losses
Losses63.5 · Games = 8 · -27.8 vs Wins
First Half71.2 · Games = 6 · -19.8 vs Second Half
Second Half91 · Games = 6 · +19.8 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Unknown

Best efficiency game

100 vs Clemson

Result
Sat 11/28vs ClemsonL 32-374869.521.50157
Sat 11/21vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume1119117.417.40147
Sat 11/14vs FloridaL 14-243409.313.30138
Sat 11/7@ TennesseeL 24-274479.611.80117
Sat 10/31@ Texas A&ML 28-354226.35.50011
Sat 10/17vs Vanderbilt100 receiving yardsW 19-10716022.922.90178
Sat 10/10@ LSU100 receiving yardsL 24-45710512.415143
Sat 10/3@ Missouri100 receiving yards · High volumeL 10-24910211.311.30035
Sat 9/26vs UCFW 31-1446913.717.30135
Sat 9/19@ GeorgiaL 20-52166.7606
Sat 9/12vs Kentucky100 receiving yards · High volumeL 22-26910011.111.10024
Thu 9/3vs North CarolinaW 17-133459.315127

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    South Carolina

    2013-2015

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20132013201420142015
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2013 PostseasonSouth Carolina54907.8
2013 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina54907.80
2014 PostseasonSouth Carolina1,13688.8251,082
2014 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina1,13688.8250
2015 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina97382.833.2-163

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Tennessee

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

233

Primary metric

233 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Unknown

191

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

191 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Vanderbilt

160

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Miami

170

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Unknown

42

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2015 Regular Season · South Carolina

973 primary output · 82.8 efficiency · 33.2 usage

64.1

#2

2014 Postseason · South Carolina

63.3

1,136 primary · 88.8 efficiency · 25 usage

#3

2014 Regular Season · South Carolina

63.3

1,136 primary · 88.8 efficiency · 25 usage

Milestones

9

100+ receiving yards

6

8+ catch outings

2

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2013 · Rating 0.8758

Havelock · Havelock, NC

Committed To
South Carolina
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2013

Career Facts

1

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

2,163

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.