Usage Score
15.9
Player Dossier
2013-2017South Carolina
Skai Moore
LB • 6'2" • 218 lbs • Cooper City, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Skai Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
40.4
Consistency
50.5
Season Value
30.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · South Carolina
13131415161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- South Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Skai Moore, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · South Carolina. Skai Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
South Carolina paired 3 primary output with 30 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · South Carolina
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
40.4
Usage
15.9
Consistency
50.5
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 1. NC State: 0.5. Missouri: 0. Kentucky: 2. Louisiana Tech: 0. Texas A&M: 1.5. Arkansas: 4. Tennessee: 2. Vanderbilt: 2. Georgia: 0. Florida: 0. Unknown: 1. Clemson: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 5 by 30.8. NC State: 8 by 38.3. Missouri: 7 by 29.2. Kentucky: 7 by 49.2. Louisiana Tech: 12 by 50. Texas A&M: 6 by 40. Arkansas: 2 by 48.3. Tennessee: 9 by 57.5. Vanderbilt: 6 by 45. Georgia: 10 by 41.7. Florida: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 5 by 30.8. Clemson: 15 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins1.2 · n=8 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · n=4 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · n=7 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=6 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
60 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Michigan | W 26-19 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Clemson10+ tackles | L 10-34 | 15 | 12 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Florida | W 28-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Georgia10+ tackles | L 10-24 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Vanderbilt | W 34-27 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Tennessee | W 15-9 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs ArkansasSplash game | W 48-22 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 17-24 | 6 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Louisiana Tech10+ tackles | W 17-16 | 12 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs KentuckySplash game | L 13-23 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Missouri | W 31-13 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs NC State | W 35-28 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
South Carolina
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201320142015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | South Carolina | 4 | 26.7 | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | South Carolina | 4 | 26.7 | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | South Carolina | 3 | 30 | — | -1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | South Carolina | 4 | 26.7 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Carolina | 0 | — | — | -4 |
| 2017 Postseason | South Carolina | 15 | 40.4 | 15.9 | 15 |
| 2017 Regular Season | South Carolina | 15 | 40.4 | 15.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
South Alabama
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#3
North Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#4
Arkansas
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.5 takeover score.
#5
Vanderbilt
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · South Carolina
3 primary output · 30 efficiency · — usage
35.2
#2
2017 Postseason · South Carolina
30.8
15 primary · 40.4 efficiency · 15.9 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · South Carolina
30.8
15 primary · 40.4 efficiency · 15.9 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
5
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8817
University School · Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Committed To
- South Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
93
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.