Usage Score
17.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Northern Illinois
Aregeros Turner
WR • 5'11" • Akron, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Aregeros Turner reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
62.8
Consistency
54.3
Season Value
51.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
13131414151516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Northern Illinois
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aregeros Turner, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Northern Illinois. Aregeros Turner reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Northern Illinois paired 415 primary output with 62.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 62.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
34.6
Efficiency
62.8
Usage
17.1
Consistency
54.3
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 19. South Florida: 39. San Diego State: 11. Unknown: 59. Ball State: 22. Western Michigan: 51. Central Michigan: 16. Buffalo: 32. Bowling Green: 56. Toledo: 19. Eastern Michigan: 84. Kent State: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 2 by 63.3. South Florida: 6 by 43.3. San Diego State: 2 by 36.7. Unknown: 7 by 56.2. Ball State: 4 by 36.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 100. Central Michigan: 2 by 53.3. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Bowling Green: 5 by 74.7. Toledo: 3 by 42.2. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Kent State: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Wins40.2 · n=5 · +14.4 vs Losses
Losses25.8 · n=6 · -14.4 vs Wins
First Half33.5 · n=6 · -2.2 vs Second Half
Second Half35.7 · n=6 · +2.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Kent State | W 31-21 | — | 1 | 7 | 6.6 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 11/17 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 84 | 17 | 28 | 1 | 74 |
| Thu 11/10 | vs Toledo | L 24-31 | — | 3 | 19 | 5 | 6.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Wed 11/2 | vs Bowling Green | W 45-20 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Buffalo | W 44-7 | — | 2 | 32 | 8.4 | 16 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Central Michigan | L 28-34 | — | 2 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Western Michigan | L 30-45 | — | 3 | 51 | 11.8 | 17 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Ball State | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 59 | 8 | 8.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs San Diego State | L 28-42 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.8 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ South Florida | L 17-48 | — | 6 | 39 | 6.3 | 6.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Wyoming | L 34-40 | — | 2 | 19 | 6 | 9.50 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Northern Illinois
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201320142014201520152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 70 | 49.7 | 11.2 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 70 | 49.7 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 398 | 63.3 | 16.5 | 328 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 398 | 63.3 | 16.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 343 | 63.9 | 21.5 | -55 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 343 | 63.9 | 21.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 415 | 62.8 | 17.1 | 72 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84
Primary metric
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#4
Marshall
55
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
415 primary output · 62.8 efficiency · 17.1 usage
51.1
#2
2014 Postseason · Northern Illinois
50.9
398 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 16.5 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
50.9
398 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 16.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8519
Copley · Akron, OH
- Committed To
- Northern Illinois
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,226
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.