Usage Score
19.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Rice
TE • 6'6" • 260 lbs • Katy, TX, USA
Robby Wells III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.4
Efficiency
49.2
Consistency
48.3
Season Value
52.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Robby Wells III, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice. Robby Wells III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rice paired 82 primary output with 49.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 49.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
11.7
Efficiency
49.2
Usage
19.4
Consistency
48.3
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 19. Pittsburgh: 28. Army: 23. UTSA: 10. UAB: 8. Southern Miss: -6. North Texas: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 4 by 31.7. Pittsburgh: 2 by 93.3. Army: 2 by 76.7. UTSA: 1 by 66.7. UAB: 2 by 26.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
93.3 vs Pittsburgh
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 45 | 65 | 6.8 | 45 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | -45 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 20 | 44.4 | 5.7 | 20 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 82 | 49.2 | 19.4 | 62 |
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28
Primary metric
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
UTSA
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
North Texas
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Rice
82 primary output · 49.2 efficiency · 19.4 usage
52.8
#2
2014 Regular Season · Rice
46.7
45 primary · 65 efficiency · 6.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Rice
37.2
20 primary · 44.4 efficiency · 5.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7993
Taylor · Katy, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
147
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Robby Wells III quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit