Usage Score
1.7
Player Dossier
2013-2017Rice
Nick Uretsky
LB • 6'0" • 240 lbs • San Antonio, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Nick Uretsky shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 8.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
8.5
Consistency
3.3
Season Value
4.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Rice
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Uretsky, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Rice. Nick Uretsky shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 8.5 disruption score.
Nick Uretsky played LB for Rice. Across 5 tracked seasons, Nick Uretsky recorded 31 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Rice.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Rice paired 0 primary output with 7.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 8.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Rice
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
8.5
Usage
1.7
Consistency
3.3
Best Game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 0. UTEP: 0. Houston: 0. Florida International: 1. Army: 0. UTSA: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. UAB: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Old Dominion: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 1 by 4.2. Houston: 5 by 20.8. Florida International: 3 by 22.5. Army: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2. UAB: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 1 by 4.2. Old Dominion: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses0.1 · Games = 9
First Half0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs First Half
All Games0.1 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
22.5 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | @ Old Dominion | L 21-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Southern Miss | L 34-43 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ UAB | L 21-52 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 28-42 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ UTSA | L 7-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Army | L 12-49 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Florida International | L 7-13 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | @ Houston | L 3-38 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ UTEP | W 31-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/27 | vs Stanford | L 7-62 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | 7.7 | 1.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 1 | 8.5 | 1.7 | 1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.8 takeover score.
#2
Houston
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 7.9 takeover score.
#3
Stanford
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 5 takeover score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.9 takeover score.
#5
UTSA
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Rice
0 primary output · 7.7 efficiency · 1.4 usage
36.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · Rice
4.7
1 primary · 8.5 efficiency · 1.7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Rice
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7806
Alamo Heights · San Antonio, TX
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
31
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.