Usage Score
18
Player Dossier
2013-2015UCLA
WR • 6'3" • Fullerton, CA, USA
Thomas Duarte reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18
Efficiency
94.8
Consistency
67.8
Season Value
70.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · UCLA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Thomas Duarte, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · UCLA. Thomas Duarte reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Thomas Duarte played WR for UCLA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Thomas Duarte recorded 1,626 receiving yards and 17 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with UCLA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
UCLA paired 872 primary output with 94.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
67.1
Efficiency
94.8
Usage
18
Consistency
67.8
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 52. Virginia: 51. UNLV: 24. BYU: 33. Arizona: 65. Arizona State: 101. Stanford: 74. California: 141. Colorado: 61. Oregon State: 116. Washington State: 30. Utah: 61. USC: 63
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 4 by 86.7. Virginia: 3 by 100. UNLV: 2 by 80. BYU: 3 by 73.3. Arizona: 4 by 100. Arizona State: 6 by 100. Stanford: 5 by 98.7. California: 10 by 94. Colorado: 3 by 100. Oregon State: 6 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 100. Utah: 2 by 100. USC: 3 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/27 | @ Nebraska | L 29-37 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ USC | L 21-40 | — | 3 | 63 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Utah | W 17-9 | — | 2 | 61 | 30.5 | 30.50 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Washington State | L 27-31 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Oregon State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-0 | — | 6 | 116 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 2 | 51 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Colorado | W 35-31 | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 38 |
| Fri 10/23 | vs California100 receiving yards · High volume | W 40-24 | — | 10 | 141 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 1 | 33 |
| Fri 10/16 | @ Stanford | L 35-56 | — | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 23-38 | — | 6 | 101 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 2 | 22 |
| Sun 9/27 | @ Arizona | W 56-30 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 35 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs BYU | W 24-23 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ UNLV | W 37-3 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Virginia | W 34-16 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 30 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCLA
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | UCLA | 214 | 66.3 | 7.9 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UCLA | 214 | 66.3 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | UCLA | 540 | 88.9 | 12.2 | 326 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UCLA | 540 | 88.9 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | UCLA | 872 | 94.8 | 18 | 332 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 872 | 94.8 | 18 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
California
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141
Primary metric
141 receiving yards with a 94 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
California
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arizona State
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon State
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · UCLA
872 primary output · 94.8 efficiency · 18 usage
70.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · UCLA
70.2
872 primary · 94.8 efficiency · 18 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · UCLA
55.5
540 primary · 88.9 efficiency · 12.2 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8969
Mater Dei · Santa Ana, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,626
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.