Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Rutgers
Sebastian Joseph
DL • 6'4" • 305 lbs • Stroudsburg, PA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Sebastian Joseph shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
19.6
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
24.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rutgers
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sebastian Joseph, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rutgers. Sebastian Joseph shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.6 disruption score.
Sebastian Joseph played DL for Rutgers. Across 5 tracked seasons, Sebastian Joseph recorded 65 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Rutgers.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 7 primary output with 19.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 19.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
19.6
Usage
6.4
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Unknown: 1. Nebraska: 0. Ohio State: 1. Illinois: 2. Purdue: 0. Maryland: 1. Penn State: 1. Indiana: 1. Michigan State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 4 by 16.7. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. Nebraska: 3 by 12.5. Ohio State: 2 by 18.3. Illinois: 1 by 24.2. Purdue: 4 by 16.7. Maryland: 5 by 30.8. Penn State: 2 by 18.3. Indiana: 4 by 26.7. Michigan State: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 3 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · Games = 7 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 6 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
30.8 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Michigan State | L 7-40 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Indiana | L 0-41 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Penn State | L 6-35 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Maryland | W 31-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Purdue | W 14-12 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Illinois | W 35-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Ohio State | L 0-56 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Nebraska | L 17-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 13-16 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Washington | L 14-30 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 5.5 | 16.4 | 5.3 | 5.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rutgers | 7 | 19.6 | 6.4 | 1.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#2
Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
#3
New Mexico
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.9 takeover score.
#4
Indiana
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.5 takeover score.
#5
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Rutgers
7 primary output · 19.6 efficiency · 6.4 usage
24.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
22.5
5.5 primary · 16.4 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8325
Stroudsburg · Stroudsburg, PA
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
65
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.