Usage Score
22.8
Player Dossier
2013-2016Rutgers
Justin Goodwin
RB • 6'0" • Madison, NJ, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Justin Goodwin leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
44.5
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
56.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
131314141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Goodwin, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Rutgers. Justin Goodwin leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 721 primary output with 44.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 44.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Loss with 149 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
65.5
Efficiency
44.5
Usage
22.8
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 95. Unknown: 16. Iowa: 74. Ohio State: 8. Michigan: 7. Illinois: 69. Minnesota: 149. Indiana: 130. Michigan State: 30. Penn State: 17. Maryland: 126
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 20 by 40.2. Unknown: 4 by 43.8. Iowa: 11 by 70.1. Ohio State: 3 by 27.8. Michigan: 3 by 24.3. Illinois: 14 by 45.1. Minnesota: 25 by 56.7. Indiana: 22 by 51.6. Michigan State: 12 by 26. Penn State: 11 by 18.9. Maryland: 15 by 85
Split Comparison
Losses70.5 · n=10
First Half44.8 · n=6 · -45.6 vs Second Half
Second Half90.4 · n=5 · +45.6 vs First Half
All Games65.5 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
85 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Maryland | L 13-31 | 10 | 86 | 8.60 | 1 | 5 | 40 | 8.4 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Penn State | L 0-39 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 1.5 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Michigan State | L 0-49 | 12 | 30 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Indiana | L 27-33 | 19 | 82 | 4.30 | 0 | 3 | 48 | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Minnesota | L 32-34 | 19 | 97 | 5.10 | 0 | 6 | 52 | 6.0 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Illinois | L 7-24 | 13 | 51 | 3.90 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 4.9 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Michigan | L 0-78 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Ohio State | L 0-58 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Iowa | L 7-14 | 11 | 74 | 6.70 | 0 | — | — | 6.7 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 13 | 4.30 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Washington | L 13-48 | 15 | 49 | 3.30 | 0 | 5 | 46 | 4.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320132014201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 607 | 39.6 | 21.1 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 607 | 39.6 | 21.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Rutgers | 385 | 40.3 | 17.2 | -222 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 385 | 40.3 | 17.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 113 | 43.6 | 3.9 | -272 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 721 | 44.5 | 22.8 | 608 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
222
Primary metric
222 scrimmage yards and 36.6 usage.
#2
Minnesota
149
Primary metric
Loss with 149 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
149 scrimmage yards and 42.4 usage.
#3
Maryland
126
Primary metric
Loss with 126 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
126 scrimmage yards and 24.2 usage.
#4
Navy
104
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
104 scrimmage yards and 39.4 usage.
#5
Indiana
130
Primary metric
Loss with 130 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
130 scrimmage yards and 41.5 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
721 primary output · 44.5 efficiency · 22.8 usage
56.5
#2
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
45.6
607 primary · 39.6 efficiency · 21.1 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
45.6
607 primary · 39.6 efficiency · 21.1 usage
Milestones
6
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8333
Madison · Madison, NJ
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,826
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.