Usage Score
5.6
Player Dossier
2013-2016Rutgers
Anthony Cioffi
DB • 6'0" • Springfield, NJ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Anthony Cioffi shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
26.9
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
13.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Cioffi, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Rutgers. Anthony Cioffi shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.9 disruption score.
Anthony Cioffi played DB for Rutgers. Across 4 tracked seasons, Anthony Cioffi recorded 63 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Rutgers.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 26.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
26.9
Usage
5.6
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 2. Unknown: 2. New Mexico: 0. Iowa: 0. Ohio State: 1. Michigan: 0. Illinois: 0. Minnesota: 0. Indiana: 0. Michigan State: 0. Penn State: 1. Maryland: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 5 by 40.8. Unknown: 5 by 40.8. New Mexico: 5 by 20.8. Iowa: 2 by 8.3. Ohio State: 8 by 43.3. Michigan: 9 by 37.5. Illinois: 7 by 29.2. Minnesota: 4 by 16.7. Indiana: 1 by 4.2. Michigan State: 1 by 4.2. Penn State: 10 by 51.7. Maryland: 6 by 25
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses0.4 · Games = 10
First Half0.8 · Games = 6 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs First Half
All Games0.5 · Games = 12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
51.7 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Maryland | L 13-31 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Penn State10+ tackles | L 0-39 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Michigan State | L 0-49 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Indiana | L 27-33 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Minnesota | L 32-34 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Illinois | L 7-24 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Michigan | L 0-78 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Ohio State | L 0-58 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Iowa | L 7-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs New Mexico | W 37-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Washington | L 13-48 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 2 | 20 | — | 2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 4 | 20 | — | 2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 6 | 26.9 | 5.6 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Nebraska
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Nebraska
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Indiana
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Penn State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
42.1
4 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Rutgers
41
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
6
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.825
Jonathan Dayton Sch · Springfield, NJ
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
63
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.