Player Stats

Tyrone Swoopes College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
4,004
Passing yards
3,038
Rushing yards
966
Touchdowns
41

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2013 PostseasonTexas546838028.4
2013 Regular SeasonTexas5591841128.4
2014 PostseasonTexas122557-32171.7
2014 Regular SeasonTexas122,6462,3522941671.7
2015 Regular SeasonTexas119885374511650.1
2016 Regular SeasonTexas1124066174724.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Texas paired 2,671 primary output with 54.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 37.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: California

Loss with 97 yards of offense and 60.9 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Texas

Games

11

Primary Metric / G

21.8

Efficiency

37.9

Usage

9.6

Consistency

28.9

Best Game by takeover score

California

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 53. UTEP: 4. California: 97. Oklahoma State: 24. Oklahoma: 7. Iowa State: 5. Kansas State: 11. Baylor: 7. Texas Tech: 18. Kansas: -1. TCU: 15

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 14 by 35.2. UTEP: 3 by 55.8. California: 12 by 60.9. Oklahoma State: 6 by 40. Oklahoma: 4 by 17.5. Iowa State: 4 by 12.5. Kansas State: 2 by 55. Baylor: 7 by 10. Texas Tech: 6 by 30. Kansas: 3 by 25. TCU: 2 by 75

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins17.4 · Games = 5 · -8.1 vs Losses
Losses25.5 · Games = 6 · +8.1 vs Wins