Usage Score
5.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Texas
Antwuan Davis
DB • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Bastrop, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Antwuan Davis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.3
Consistency
10
Season Value
12.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Texas
131415161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antwuan Davis, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Texas. Antwuan Davis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.3 disruption score.
Antwuan Davis played DB for Texas. Across 5 tracked seasons, Antwuan Davis recorded 41 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Texas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Texas paired 0 primary output with 7.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Texas
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
18.3
Usage
5.4
Consistency
10
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 0. Maryland: 0. San José State: 0. USC: 0. Oklahoma: 0. Baylor: 0. TCU: 1. Kansas: 2. West Virginia: 2. Texas Tech: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 5 by 20.8. Maryland: 1 by 4.2. San José State: 1 by 4.2. USC: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma: 1 by 4.2. Baylor: 3 by 12.5. TCU: 7 by 39.2. Kansas: 3 by 32.5. West Virginia: 6 by 45. Texas Tech: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.8 · Games = 5 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 5 · -1 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · Games = 5 · +1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
45 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | @ Missouri | W 33-16 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Texas Tech | L 23-27 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ West Virginia | W 28-14 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs KansasSplash game | W 42-27 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ TCU | L 7-24 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Baylor | W 38-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Oklahoma | L 24-29 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | @ USC | L 24-27 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs San José State | W 56-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Maryland | L 41-51 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas | 0 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Texas | 5 | 18.3 | 5.4 | 5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas | 5 | 18.3 | 5.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#2
Kansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
#3
TCU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 33.2 takeover score.
#4
Missouri
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.2 takeover score.
#5
Texas Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Texas
0 primary output · 7.5 efficiency · 1.3 usage
36.3
#2
2017 Postseason · Texas
12.6
5 primary · 18.3 efficiency · 5.4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Texas
12.6
5 primary · 18.3 efficiency · 5.4 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9384
Bastrop · Bastrop, TX
- Committed To
- Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
41
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.