Usage Score
26.3
Player Profile
Drew Morgan
WR • 6'0" • Greenwood, AR, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Drew Morgan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.5
Consistency
65.2
Season Value
64.1
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arkansas
13141415151616
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Arkansas
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arkansas
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Drew Morgan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arkansas. Drew Morgan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Arkansas paired 843 primary output with 78.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Arkansas
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
56.8
Efficiency
70.5
Usage
26.3
Consistency
65.2
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 75. Louisiana Tech: 47. TCU: 93. Texas State: 28. Texas A&M: 86. Unknown: 47. Alabama: 43. Ole Miss: 34. Auburn: 42. Florida: 95. LSU: 4. Mississippi State: 91. Missouri: 54
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 4 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 62.7. TCU: 7 by 88.6. Texas State: 3 by 62.2. Texas A&M: 9 by 63.7. Unknown: 4 by 78.3. Alabama: 5 by 57.3. Ole Miss: 4 by 56.7. Auburn: 4 by 70. Florida: 7 by 90.5. LSU: 1 by 26.7. Mississippi State: 6 by 100. Missouri: 6 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins64.7 · n=6 · +14.0 vs Losses
Losses50.7 · n=6 · -14.0 vs Wins
First Half59.9 · n=7 · +6.5 vs Second Half
Second Half53.3 · n=6 · -6.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Virginia Tech | L 24-35 | — | 4 | 75 | 15.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 36 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Missouri | L 24-28 | — | 6 | 54 | 8.9 | 9 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Mississippi State | W 58-42 | — | 6 | 91 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs LSU | L 10-38 | — | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Florida | W 31-10 | — | 7 | 95 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Auburn | L 3-56 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Ole Miss | W 34-30 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Alabama | L 30-49 | — | 5 | 43 | 6.2 | 8.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Texas A&MHigh volume | L 24-45 | — | 9 | 86 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Texas State | W 42-3 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ TCU | W 41-38 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 21-20 | — | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Arkansas | 181 | 83.8 | 14 | 181 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arkansas | 181 | 83.8 | 14 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Arkansas | 843 | 78.3 | 25.6 | 662 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas | 843 | 78.3 | 25.6 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas | 739 | 70.5 | 26.3 | -104 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas | 739 | 70.5 | 26.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
155
Primary metric
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ole Miss
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 90.5 efficiency score.
#4
TCU
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 88.6 efficiency score.
#5
Mississippi State
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Arkansas
843 primary output · 78.3 efficiency · 25.6 usage
65.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Arkansas
65.3
843 primary · 78.3 efficiency · 25.6 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Arkansas
64.1
739 primary · 70.5 efficiency · 26.3 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7908
Greenwood · Greenwood, AR
- Committed To
- Arkansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,763
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.