Usage Score
18.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Bowling Green
WR • 5'9" • Sanford, FL, USA
Ronnie Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.1
Efficiency
69.1
Consistency
64.1
Season Value
51.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ronnie Moore, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Bowling Green. Ronnie Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 954 primary output with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 69.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
42.8
Efficiency
69.1
Usage
18.1
Consistency
64.1
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 45. Unknown: 39. Middle Tennessee: 17. Memphis: 37. Eastern Michigan: 10. Ohio: 76. Toledo: 36. Miami (OH): 81. Northern Illinois: 71. Akron: 10. Kent State: 81. Buffalo: 10
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 5 by 60. Unknown: 3 by 86.7. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 28.3. Memphis: 6 by 41.1. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 66.7. Ohio: 3 by 100. Toledo: 3 by 80. Miami (OH): 5 by 100. Northern Illinois: 4 by 100. Akron: 2 by 33.3. Kent State: 4 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 33.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs Buffalo | W 27-19 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Wed 11/16 | vs Kent State | W 42-7 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 48 |
| Thu 11/10 | @ Akron | W 38-28 | — | 2 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Wed 11/2 | @ Northern Illinois | L 20-45 | — | 4 | 71 | 15.4 | 17.80 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Miami (OH) | L 26-40 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Toledo | L 35-42 | — | 3 | 36 | 9.5 | 12 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Ohio | L 24-30 | — | 3 | 76 | 16.8 | 25.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 25-28 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Memphis | L 3-77 | — | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 21-41 | — | 4 | 17 | 2.4 | 4.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 39 | 10.5 | 13 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Ohio State | L 10-77 | — | 5 | 45 | 8.3 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Bowling Green | 547 | 74.3 | 15.1 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 547 | 74.3 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Bowling Green | 690 | 69.8 | 18 | 143 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 690 | 69.8 | 18 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Bowling Green | 954 | 77.4 | 18.3 | 264 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 954 | 77.4 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 513 | 69.1 | 18.1 | -441 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
161
Primary metric
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Buffalo
178
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
178 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kent State
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
151
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
151 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Bowling Green
954 primary output · 77.4 efficiency · 18.3 usage
66.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · Bowling Green
66.2
954 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 18.3 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
51.7
513 primary · 69.1 efficiency · 18.1 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7819
Seminole · Sanford, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,704
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 53 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Ronnie Moore quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit