Player Stats

Anthony Shegog College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
46
TFL
6
Sacks
1.5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
4
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech10-0--150
2016 PostseasonVirginia Tech12611--044.4
2016 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech121620.513044.4
2017 PostseasonVirginia Tech112-0--031.1
2017 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech11223021031.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Virginia Tech paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 14.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Virginia Tech

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

14.5

Usage

4.2

Consistency

12.1

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 0. West Virginia: 0. Delaware: 1. East Carolina: 0. Old Dominion: 1. Clemson: 1. Boston College: 0. North Carolina: 0. Duke: 0. Georgia Tech: 3. Pittsburgh: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. West Virginia: 2 by 8.3. Delaware: 0 by 10. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Old Dominion: 0 by 10. Clemson: 0 by 10. Boston College: 1 by 4.2. North Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Duke: 1 by 4.2. Georgia Tech: 11 by 75.8. Pittsburgh: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.3 · Games = 8 · -1.1 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 3 · +1.1 vs Wins