Player Stats

Andrew Motuapuaka College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
206
TFL
17
Sacks
5.5
QB hurries
11
Passes defended
10
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech10-0--141.2
2016 PostseasonVirginia Tech1480.50--065.8
2016 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech141065254065.8
2017 PostseasonVirginia Tech13710-1078.3
2017 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech138510.53.565078.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Virginia Tech paired 28 primary output with 51 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 51 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Virginia Tech

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

2.2

Efficiency

51

Usage

12.1

Consistency

62.2

Best Game by takeover score

North Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 2. West Virginia: 4. Delaware: 1.5. East Carolina: 2. Old Dominion: 4. Clemson: 0. Boston College: 1.5. North Carolina: 4.5. Duke: 1. Miami: 1. Georgia Tech: 1.5. Pittsburgh: 3. Virginia: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 7 by 49.2. West Virginia: 12 by 90. Delaware: 8 by 48.3. East Carolina: 6 by 45. Old Dominion: 3 by 52.5. Clemson: 9 by 37.5. Boston College: 6 by 40. North Carolina: 9 by 82.5. Duke: 6 by 35. Miami: 4 by 26.7. Georgia Tech: 12 by 65. Pittsburgh: 7 by 59.2. Virginia: 3 by 32.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.6 · Games = 9 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 4 · -1.5 vs Wins