Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2013-2017Virginia Tech
Andrew Motuapuaka
LB • 6'0" • 233 lbs • Virginia Beach, VA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Andrew Motuapuaka shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
46.4
Consistency
66.9
Season Value
36.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Virginia Tech
13141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Virginia Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Motuapuaka, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Virginia Tech. Andrew Motuapuaka shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Virginia Tech paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 46.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Virginia Tech
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
46.4
Usage
12.5
Consistency
66.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 2. West Virginia: 2. Unknown: 0.5. East Carolina: 2. Old Dominion: 3. Clemson: 0. Boston College: 1.5. North Carolina: 3.5. Duke: 1. Miami: 1. Georgia Tech: 0.5. Pittsburgh: 3. Virginia: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 7 by 49.2. West Virginia: 12 by 70. Unknown: 8 by 38.3. East Carolina: 6 by 45. Old Dominion: 3 by 42.5. Clemson: 9 by 37.5. Boston College: 6 by 40. North Carolina: 9 by 72.5. Duke: 6 by 35. Miami: 4 by 26.7. Georgia Tech: 12 by 55. Pittsburgh: 7 by 59.2. Virginia: 3 by 32.5
Split Comparison
Wins2.3 · n=8 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · n=4 · -1.4 vs Wins
First Half1.6 · n=7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Carolina
Best efficiency game
72.5 vs North Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | @ Oklahoma State | L 21-30 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Virginia | W 10-0 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs PittsburghSplash game | W 20-14 | 7 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Georgia Tech10+ tackles | L 22-28 | 12 | 7 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/5 | @ Miami | L 10-28 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Duke | W 24-3 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs North CarolinaSplash game | W 59-7 | 9 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Boston College | W 23-10 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/1 | vs Clemson | L 17-31 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Old Dominion | W 38-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ East Carolina | W 64-17 | 6 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | vs West Virginia10+ tackles | W 31-24 | 12 | 9 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Virginia Tech
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 14.5 | 42.8 | 10.2 | 13.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 14.5 | 42.8 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Virginia Tech | 22 | 46.4 | 12.5 | 7.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 22 | 46.4 | 12.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 68.2 takeover score.
#2
North Carolina
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.9 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Pittsburgh
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.2 takeover score.
#5
Georgia Tech
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Virginia Tech
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.3
#2
2017 Postseason · Virginia Tech
36.6
22 primary · 46.4 efficiency · 12.5 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Virginia Tech
36.6
22 primary · 46.4 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
3
Splash games
6
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8564
Salem · Virginia Beach, VA
- Committed To
- Virginia Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
206
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.