Usage Score
19.5
Player Dossier
2013-2017Utah
Troy Williams
QB • 6'2" • 208 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Troy Williams is a balanced quarterback profile with 19.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
43.9
Consistency
63.7
Season Value
39.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Utah
1314161617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Washington • Utah
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Troy Williams, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Utah. Troy Williams is a balanced quarterback profile with 19.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Troy Williams played QB for Washington and Utah. Across 4 tracked seasons, Troy Williams recorded 3,745 passing yards, 335 rushing yards, and 5 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Utah.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Utah paired 2,992 primary output with 55.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 43.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington, Utah.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with 270 yards of offense and 57.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Utah
Games
6
Primary Metric / G
147.8
Efficiency
43.9
Usage
19.5
Consistency
63.7
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San José State: 2. Arizona: 146. Stanford: 262. USC: 270. Washington State: 0. Colorado: 207
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San José State: 2 by 30. Arizona: 22 by 62. Stanford: 48 by 52.1. USC: 41 by 57.8. Washington State: 1 by 0. Colorado: 36 by 61.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins118.3 · Games = 3 · -59.0 vs Losses
Losses177.3 · Games = 3 · +59.0 vs Wins
First Half136.7 · Games = 3 · -22.3 vs Second Half
Second Half159 · Games = 3 · +22.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
62 vs Arizona
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | vs Colorado | W 34-13 | 15 | 24 | 181 | 62.5 | 0 | 0 | 61.8 | 12 | 26 | 2.20 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Washington State | L 25-33 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | @ USC | L 27-28 | 16 | 27 | 262 | 59.3 | 1 | 1 | 57.8 | 14 | 8 | 0.60 | 1 | 6 |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Stanford | L 20-23 | 20 | 39 | 238 | 51.3 | 1 | 2 | 52.1 | 9 | 24 | 2.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Arizona | W 30-24 | 9 | 18 | 131 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 4 | 15 | 3.80 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 9/17 | vs San José State | W 54-16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2013-2014
Opening stop
- 2
Utah
2016-2017
Final stop
Season Progression
20132014201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Washington | 201 | 51.7 | 12.8 | 201 |
| 2016 Postseason | Utah | 2,992 | 55.9 | 18.5 | 2,791 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah | 2,992 | 55.9 | 18.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah | 887 | 43.9 | 19.5 | -2,105 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
318
Primary metric
318 total offense with 65.2 efficiency.
#2
USC
270
Primary metric
Loss with 270 yards of offense and 57.8 efficiency.
270 total offense with 57.8 efficiency.
#3
Oregon
275
Primary metric
Loss with 275 yards of offense and 68 efficiency.
275 total offense with 68 efficiency.
#4
Arizona State
308
Primary metric
Win with 308 yards of offense and 63.4 efficiency.
308 total offense with 63.4 efficiency.
#5
Stanford
262
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
262 total offense with 52.1 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Utah
2,992 primary output · 55.9 efficiency · 18.5 usage
64.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Utah
64.3
2,992 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 18.5 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Utah
39.6
887 primary · 43.9 efficiency · 19.5 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9541
Narbonne · Harbor City, CA
- Committed To
- Washington
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
4,080
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.